![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjeE1t-_zibipVUlD7vK7EApgzBY2G_7rocCk4e9RK3KjCagplPl96HScvPGAog7EJjqKH_MRDFetRIUKm4Ye1yelMpWoeTUfb7Ra5BfcE-t-R1RyyDYfkkccv0VVRImFSLbz7ApgW6pyRE/s320/hpi-delta-from-peak-201005.png)
Given the state of the market since April 2007, the Home Price Index results are a positive for both the housing market and the economy, but we have to remember that May’s half-point increase is an average, and not specific to a particular area.
In contrast to “national markets”, the real estate markets in which you and I live are decidedly local. It’s a major difference and the distinction renders the Home Price Index somewhat less important.
After all, the HPI doesn’t account for housing activity in individual neighborhoods , nor does it track value across cities.
Instead, it summarizes data in giant chunks of geography.
A quick look at the HPI regional data proves the point. Of the HPI’s 9 tracked regions, only one was within one-tenth of one percent of the national, half-point average. The others varied by as much 1.3 percent.
As a sample:
- Mountain Region : + 1.7 percent
- New England : + 0.2 percent
- South Atlantic : +1.0 percent
Real estate values cannot be captured in a national survey. For home buyers and seller, what matters is the economics of a block, on a street, in a neighborhood. That type of granularity can’t be tracked in a report like the Home Price Index.
The best place to get that data is from a local real estate agent that knows the market well.